The Theory Is Real

The clouds on 4/11 were WRONG. Anyone else?

ArcherAtmosphere
ArcherAtmosphere
OP2 days ago
I don't know how else to describe it. The cloud cover on April 11th looked rendered. Edges too sharp, shadows pointing two different directions over Albuquerque between 6:10 and 6:40 PM. Took 14 photos before the sky corrected itself. I'm not a crank — I ran a VFX pipeline for 11 years and I know a compositing error when I see one.
👁 52🔥 28
WhittakerWatcher
WhittakerWatcher
2 days ago
Two light sources = two suns, or a missed occlusion pass. Neither is meteorologically possible. Post the photos.
🔥 17
KerriganKnows
KerriganKnows
2 days ago
Just joined this forum yesterday and this is the exact thing I saw in Flagstaff on the 11th. I thought I was losing it. I'm actually shaking right now.
ArcherAtmosphere
ArcherAtmosphere
2 days ago
@KerriganKnows welcome. You are not losing it. Log the time, direction you were facing, and anything that felt subjectively 'off' beyond the visual. The subjective layer is data too.
👁 12
MazettiMidnight
MazettiMidnight
yesterday
Same evening, Kansas City, my dog would not look up. Not once. He's normally a cloud-tracker. He knew.
👁 24
HaleOnHigh
HaleOnHigh
yesterday
we talked about this in 2019. the render budget gets thin on tuesdays and fridays. nothing has changed. nothing will.
🛸 33
FinchFrequency
FinchFrequency
18 hours ago
Correlate with the 19.7 Hz hum I documented that night. If anyone felt pressure behind the eyes 6-7 PM local, that's the marker.